For attorneys representing victims of medical malpractice, it is a sad truth that jurors tend to want to find ways to blame the patient victim.
There are real and obvious hazards to patients of electronic health records (EHR).
A recent California lawsuit alleges that orthopedic surgeons used "knock-off" spine hardware in surgeries. Much of the hardware failed, causing patients serious medical issues, while the surgeons, clinics and machine shop fabricating the hardware apparently reaped thousands of dollars in profits from using the counterfeit products.
The New England Journal of Medicine concludes that medical malpractice lawsuits do not result in the practice of "defensive medicine." What they do result in is making it more difficult, and sometimes impossible, for patient victims to recover anything for their harms and losses.
Electronic Health Records (EHRs) can be dangerous to patients when doctors and other healthcare providers spend less time taking a history and more time scanning through often repetitive information in the patient’s electronic chart.
Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems can cause serious diagnostic and treatment errors
Wrongful birth cases are complicated, both medically and legally but also emotionally. Recovering for the wrongful birth of a child is allowed in Washington state, and the rationale behind it is sound.
The Joint Commission’s review of "sentinel events" in hospitals works to understand why mistakes were made and how hospitals can avoid them in the future.
