This article originally appeared in the May 2021 issue of Trial News. What. A. Year. As much as has already been written about the pandemic,
Still appears to work better in combination with radiologists Researchers from Google and medical systems in the US and Britain may be providing clarity on
Causation can be a very difficult, and sometimes insurmountable, hurdle in bringing a successful claim alleging a delay in diagnosing a condition.
There has been no consensus among cardiologists about whether cardiac disease screening should be done and how effective it is in determining risk of heart disease.
A recent study revealed that pigeons are well suited to help researchers better understand human medical image perception.
If you handle medical negligence cases, you have probably received calls concerning a death after a doctor failed to provide a spouse or loved one
Many potential clients who contact us about a case emphasize that, in their case, the medical negligence was clear or egregious. Of course, proving that a medical provider was negligent is the first step in a case. But the second step – proving causation – is often the more difficult burden to meet.
This paper outlines practical suggestions for dealing with expert witnesses in medical negligence cases and most personal injury cases. Suggestions are offered for ways of locating and retaining credible experts, what to send them, preparing them for their depositions, and developing trial testimony.
Trends in medical negligence law and litigation, including economic and social changes that impact the number of claims, changes in public perceptions, expanding concepts of liability, difficulties in determining responsibility for particular care decisions, systems errors, and telemedicine are outlined.
As I recently wrote here, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is creeping into healthcare, and particularly radiologic services. What I didn’t realize then, but do now, is
