CASES WE HANDLE

Wrong-Site Surgeries

Seattle Malpractic Attorney Wrong-site SurgeriesOver the years surgeons have developed a number of safeguards to prevent operations on the wrong place. They take time-outs in the operating room, mark the correct site with a marker, or even have patients mark the correct areas themselves. And yet, wrong-site surgeries still occur and patients have unwanted operations without getting the procedure they asked for and needed.

What Is Wrong-Site Surgery?

Wrong-site surgery is a shocking and preventable medical error that occurs when a surgeon operates on the wrong body part, performs the wrong procedure, or operates on the wrong patient entirely.

Is Wrong-Site Surgery Always Malpractice?

Almost always. In nearly every instance, a wrong-site surgery is a preventable, serious error that violates surgical safety protocols. It is a clear breach of the standard of care.

How Do Wrong-Site Surgeries Happen?

They often occur due to failures in preoperative verification, a lack of proper site marking, communication breakdowns among the surgical team members, or ignoring surgical safety checklists that are designed to prevent these very errors.

What Injuries Can Result From Wrong-Site Surgery?

Patients can suffer the unnecessary removal of healthy tissue or organs, permanent disability, a worsening of their original condition due to a delay in the correct surgery, emotional trauma, and the need for additional surgeries to address the error.

How Are Wrong-Site Surgery Malpractice Cases Proven?

These cases are typically straightforward and are proven by operative reports, hospital policies, and witness testimony showing that the procedure was performed on the wrong site or the wrong patient, violating clear standards of surgical care.

 

Bill was a machinist who injured his right ankle at work and was scheduled for ankle surgery at a free-standing surgery center. Unfortunately, the podiatrist performed the planned surgery on the left ankle instead of the right. Legal issues in the case included apportioning fault between the nurse and the physician but the major issue was that of causation. The defense contended that his left ankle problems were not related to the wrong-site surgery but rather to pre-existing ankle problems that had not been diagnosed before. After extensive litigation with experts on both sides, the case settled a month before trial.

Related Posts From
The CMG Voice